@ARTICLE{26583242_179405681_2016, 
	author = {Maria Monica Wihardja}, 
	keywords = {, Indonesia, commodity boom, structural transformation, fiscal policy, inequalityenvironmental degradation},
	title = {<p class="text">Natural Resources Management: The Effect of the Commodity Boom on Indonesia&rsquo;s Industrial Development and Welfare</p>},
	journal = {INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL},
	year = {2016},
	month = {март},
	volume = {11},
	number = {1},
	pages = {48-70},
	url = {https://iorj.hse.ru/en/2016-11-1/179405681.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {The end of the commodity boom in 2012 once again exposed Indonesia to the vulnerability of the commodity price shocks. This article reviews how Indonesia managed its natural resources in 2001-12 and when the commodity boom ends. What are the lessons learned? Indonesia&rsquo;s experience is similar to that of other countries&nbsp; rich in natural resources, including the crowding-out of non-commodity sectors, protectionist trade regimes, fiscal inefficiency, slow skill accumulation, rising inequality and environmental damages. In the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008-09, the early trade -policy response at the end of the commodity boom is inward-looking and protective of domestic markets and industries and aims to increase the added value of commodities by downstreaming. This trend is clearly reflected in the 2014 Trade Law, the 2014 Industry Law and the mineral export ban, which was introduced in 2009 through the 2009 Law on Mining of Coal and Minerals and took effect in 2014. Indonesia should learn from other countries in managing its resource revenues, such as through a commodity fund designed to fit its domestic specificity. Reindustrializing, increasing agricultural productivity beyond palm oil and tapping the country&rsquo;s potential in the services sector including tourism and creative industries are also necessary to promote diversification in production and trade. Resource management policy should also include stronger environmental regulations.},
	annote = {The end of the commodity boom in 2012 once again exposed Indonesia to the vulnerability of the commodity price shocks. This article reviews how Indonesia managed its natural resources in 2001-12 and when the commodity boom ends. What are the lessons learned? Indonesia&rsquo;s experience is similar to that of other countries&nbsp; rich in natural resources, including the crowding-out of non-commodity sectors, protectionist trade regimes, fiscal inefficiency, slow skill accumulation, rising inequality and environmental damages. In the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008-09, the early trade -policy response at the end of the commodity boom is inward-looking and protective of domestic markets and industries and aims to increase the added value of commodities by downstreaming. This trend is clearly reflected in the 2014 Trade Law, the 2014 Industry Law and the mineral export ban, which was introduced in 2009 through the 2009 Law on Mining of Coal and Minerals and took effect in 2014. Indonesia should learn from other countries in managing its resource revenues, such as through a commodity fund designed to fit its domestic specificity. Reindustrializing, increasing agricultural productivity beyond palm oil and tapping the country&rsquo;s potential in the services sector including tourism and creative industries are also necessary to promote diversification in production and trade. Resource management policy should also include stronger environmental regulations.}
}